Buckeye by Patrick Ryan — A Thoughtful, Uneven Portrait of Place, Memory, and Moral Drift

There are novels that announce themselves loudly, and others that arrive quietly, asking the reader to lean in. Buckeye by Patrick Ryan belongs firmly to the latter category. It is a book preoccupied with small towns, long memories, and the moral residue of past choices — the kind that don’t explode into drama so much as settle into the soil and refuse to leave.

This is a novel about place as destiny, about the way a community can both cradle and constrain the people who remain within it. And while Buckeye offers moments of emotional clarity and thematic ambition, it is also a novel that struggles with balance — between intimacy and sprawl, momentum and reflection, promise and payoff.

Between The Covers with Danielle | Literary Sips | Buckeye book review

A Town That Remembers Everything

At its core, Buckeye is interested in what it means to stay — and what it costs. The novel is set in a Midwestern town that feels immediately familiar, even if you’ve never been there: insular, watchful, shaped by shared history and unspoken rules. Ryan renders this environment with care, capturing the rhythms of small-town life and the way personal histories become communal property.

There is an undeniable strength in how place functions here. Buckeye itself feels less like a backdrop and more like a silent adjudicator, bearing witness to its inhabitants’ choices and quietly tallying their consequences. The town remembers. The town judges. And the town, in many ways, never quite lets anyone go.

This is where the novel is at its most compelling — in its examination of how environments shape moral imagination, how proximity breeds both intimacy and suffocation.

Ambition Without Full Cohesion

Ryan’s thematic reach is broad. Buckeye grapples with loyalty, masculinity, regret, and the long aftershocks of youthful decisions. The novel asks difficult questions about responsibility: What do we owe the people we come from? At what point does staying become complicity? Is inertia a form of choice?

These are rich, worthwhile questions — but they are not always given the narrative scaffolding they need to land with full force. At times, the novel feels caught between being a tightly focused character study and a more expansive social portrait. The result is an uneven pacing that occasionally dilutes emotional impact.

There are stretches where the story seems to hover rather than advance, circling its themes without pressing them forward. Reflection dominates action, and while this can be effective in moderation, here it sometimes stalls momentum.

Character Depth: Moments of Insight, Missed Opportunities

The characters in Buckeye are thoughtfully conceived, but not always fully realised on the page. Ryan clearly understands their inner lives, yet the translation of that understanding into sustained character development feels inconsistent.

Some moments cut sharply — brief scenes of emotional recognition that hint at a deeper, more devastating novel just beneath the surface. In these instances, the book briefly achieves a kind of quiet brilliance, allowing internal conflict to speak louder than plot mechanics.

Elsewhere, however, characters feel slightly held at arm’s length. Motivations are suggested rather than interrogated, and certain emotional arcs resolve more through implication than transformation. This leaves the reader intellectually engaged but emotionally undernourished — aware of what the novel is reaching for, without always feeling its full weight.

Style and Sensibility

Ryan’s prose is restrained, clean, and purposeful. There is no excess here — no indulgent lyricism or stylistic bravado. This works well for the story he is telling, reinforcing the emotional reserve of the world he depicts.

However, this same restraint sometimes limits the novel’s expressive range. In moments that might have benefitted from sharper specificity or deeper immersion, the prose remains measured, almost cautious. The result is a book that is consistently competent, occasionally moving, but rarely overwhelming.

It is a novel that asks for patience rather than devotion — and that distinction matters.

A Three-Star Truth

Rating Buckeye at three stars is not a dismissal; it is an acknowledgment of both its strengths and its shortcomings. This is a novel with a strong premise, thoughtful intentions, and flashes of emotional resonance. It is also a book that does not fully capitalise on its own ambitions.

I was glad to read it. I was interested while reading it. I did not, however, feel altered by it — and for a novel so deeply concerned with consequence, that feels telling.

Still, Buckeye lingers in quieter ways. It leaves behind questions rather than scenes, atmospheres rather than moments. And sometimes, that is its own kind of success.

Final Thoughts

Buckeye will appeal to readers who enjoy reflective literary fiction, small-town narratives, and moral ambiguity over clean resolution. It is a book more interested in mood than momentum, in ethical tension than dramatic payoff.

If you are drawn to novels that examine the long shadow of place and the subtle costs of staying put, this one is worth your time — just not your unqualified praise.

⭐️⭐️⭐️A thoughtful, flawed novel that stays with you intellectually, even if it doesn’t quite settle in the heart.

Between The Covers With Danielle | Literary Sips | Danielle Robinson - Literary Critic